Furthering my idea that uses the campaign as a little sample of what a presidency would be like, lets consider Hillary delegate math in the Florida/Michigan controversy.
Florida and Michigan straight up broke the rules. They knew if they moved the primary up, that they would not be counted. The DNC rules explicitly stated this, and they knew, but they did it anyway. The DNC then told all the candidates to please remove their names from the ballot in Michigan, and so Obama and Edwards both followed suit and did this. But who didnt? Who had a blatant disregard for authority? Who charged ahead according to her own desires, seeing the opportunity to win a state handily? Thats right. Hillary Clinton. Even with Hillary's name being the only one on the ballot, STILL a good 40% voted "uncommitted" in the states primaries. Shocking. Re-do spells disaster for Hillary in Michigan. And now shes demanding that they include Michigan and Florida, which is AGAINST THE DNC RULES, because shes too far behind and has no hope without them.
If we consider the DNC convention rules as perhaps the democratic party's version of the Constitution of the USA, is this behavior what we would see in the White House? Will Hillary Clinton carry on her blatant disregard of the democratic process, of rules set in place before her that don't benefit her own person? Hillary would destroy our country. She can't listen, she can't take advice, she can't see truth or logic. She has no concept of the rules, of strategy, of the people she claims to represent! She would completely ignore the Constitution, altering it and simply pretending it didn't exist to benefit herself. People say McCain would be a third Bush term. I say Hillary would be.
thats all.
No comments:
Post a Comment